Cases 1 - 10 of 766
Williams v. Alvarado et al
as 3:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Defendant:
M. Alvarado, A. Rendon and N. Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Allison et al
as 3:2024cv01382
Defendant:
M. Palmer, R. Buckel, Juarez and others
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gaither v. Williams, et al.
as 3:2024cv01112
Defendant:
S Williams, A. George, Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Burrell A. Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gaither v. Williams. et al.
as 3:2024cv01089
Respondent:
S. Amador, Smith, - Williams and others
Petitioner:
Burrell A. Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hayes et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Defendant:
James E. Simmons, Jr., Judge Bernard G. Skomal, Judge Karen S. Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Newsom et al
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
Michael Newman, Gavin Newsom, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Shadale Lewis Williams
Defendant:
Terrance Steadman, Fred Sedighi, K. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnell v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Joe Baby Burnell
Defendant:
W. Montgomery, Ali Hasan, B. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher, Mr. Rogers and Mr. Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Paramo et al
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Marcus Pollard, M. Hagemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
