Cases 1 - 10 of 12,089
Anaya v. Vasquez et al
as 3:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera Anaya
Defendant:
V. Vasquez, T. Harley, Case Management Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Bonilla v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00848
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bentley v. Inzunza et al
as 3:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ray Bentley
Defendant:
Marisol Inzunza, A. Enriquez and O. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Milton Melvin Rodgers
Respondent:
J. Hill and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TerVeer v. Cuevas + the People et al
as 3:2024cv00847
Petitioner:
Justin TerVeer
Respondent:
Cuevas + the People and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Stephan
as 3:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Rayon Jones
Defendant:
Summer Stephan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Shadale Lewis Williams
Defendant:
Terrance Steadman, Fred Sedighi, K. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Childress v. USA
as 3:2024cv00815
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Childress, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
