Cases 91 - 100 of 173
Wanton v. Virga et al
as 3:2013cv01240
Petitioner:
Gregory Wanton
Respondent:
Tim Virga and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dumlao v. Cates et al
as 3:2013cv01190
Petitioner:
Romeo Balbin Dumlao, Jr.
Respondent:
Matthew C. Cates and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunsmore v. Paramo et al
as 3:2013cv01193
Petitioner:
Darryl Dunsmore
Respondent:
Paramo and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Hill et al
as 3:2013cv01191
Petitioner:
Gildardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Rick Hill and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meade v. Diaz et al
as 3:2013cv01183
Petitioner:
Andre Brian Meade
Respondent:
Ralph M. Diaz and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynch v. Price et al
as 3:2013cv01148
Petitioner:
Lee Roy Lynch
Respondent:
Price and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banner v. Janda et al
as 3:2013cv00808
Petitioner:
Lawrence Banner
Respondent:
G. J. Janda and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baek v. Long et al
as 3:2013cv00421
Petitioner:
Teddy Seung Baek
Respondent:
David Long and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branch v. Swarthout et al
as 3:2013cv00386
Petitioner:
Derrick Branch
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. Brazelton et al
as 3:2013cv00150
Petitioner:
Luis Vicente Cruz
Respondent:
P. D. Brazelton , Kamala Harris and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
