Cases 101 - 110 of 173
Colbert v. Miller et al
as 3:2012cv02941
Petitioner:
Charles Colbert
Respondent:
Amy Miller and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Al Khafaji v. Paramo et al
as 3:2012cv02850
Petitioner:
Haydar T. Al Khafaji
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Janda et al
as 3:2012cv02703
Petitioner:
Steven Allen Bennett
Respondent:
Gerald Janda , Matthew Cate and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norton v. Valenzuela et al
as 3:2012cv02634
Petitioner:
Johnny Norton
Respondent:
E. Valenzuela and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Brazelton et al
as 3:2012cv02479
Petitioner:
Nolan Demetrius Jackson
Respondent:
P. D. Brazelton and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gann v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv02387
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Marcus Gann
Respondent:
Matthew Cate and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forch v. Paramo et al
as 3:2012cv02358
Petitioner:
Franklin Larance Forch
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv02281
Petitioner:
Gustavo Lara Perez
Respondent:
Matthew Cate and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. Blakely et al
as 3:2012cv02061
Petitioner:
Luis Vicente Cruz
Respondent:
John Michael Blakely , P. D. Brazelton and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Janoe v. Janda et al
as 3:2012cv01903
Petitioner:
Bobby S. Janoe
Respondent:
G. J. Janda and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
