Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Nguyen et al v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 3:2020cv01472
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, CVS Caremark, DOES 1 throught 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Nguyen and Rafal Pytlik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jennings v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01421
Plaintiff:
Darcella Jennings
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
Arriola v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 3:2020cv00083
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy and DOES 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Audrey Arriola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01561
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and DOES 1 to 50
Plaintiff:
Nicole Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi
Morgan v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00292
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 10, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Diamond Parking Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mark Morgan
Cross Defendant:
Roes 1 to 10, individuals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Rocha v. Long's Drug Stores California LLC et al
as 3:2018cv02567
Defendant:
Does 1 to 20, Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C., CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nasery v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02190
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Does 1 through 20, Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Malalai Nasery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mm
Ferguson v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01529
Plaintiff:
Les Ferguson
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ducrocq-Vaknin et al v. Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2018cv01305
Defendant:
Does 1 to 20, CVS Pharmacy Inc, Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Sydney Issac Vaknin and Deborah Ducrocq-Vaknin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi
Kennedy v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02585
Plaintiff:
Erin Kennedy
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
