Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 11 - 20 of 110
Matzner v. Citibank, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01015
Plaintiff: Andres Matzner
Defendant: Citibank, N.A. and Does 1 to 10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pd Removal- Property Damage
Mitchell v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01008
Plaintiff: Austin Mitchell
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castillo v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01007
Plaintiff: Rogerio Castillo
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Paz v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00928
Plaintiff: Jasmine Paz
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00914
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Velarde v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00586
Plaintiff: Monica Velarde
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alexander, Jr. v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00553
Plaintiff: Curtis T. Alexander, Jr.
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bermudez Iglesias v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00502
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Bermudez Iglesias
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brady v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff: Michael Brady
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02077
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?