Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Martin v. Kim et al
as 3:2021cv02091
Plaintiff:
Debra Martin
Defendant:
O. C. Kim, Yun J. Lee, David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd
Harwood v. Kim et al
as 3:2021cv01837
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harwood
Defendant:
OC Kim, David Brown, Joon Won Jyoung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Abila et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2021cv01766
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Abila, Nicholas Alexander, Jessica Alvillar-Flores and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Franklin v. Newsom et al
as 3:2021cv01645
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Franklin, Sr.
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Jerry Brown, Jr., Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carroll Metal Works, Inc. v. Franklin et al
as 3:2021cv01535
Plaintiff:
Carroll Metal Works, Inc.
Defendant:
Robin J. Franklin, Sleight Consultants, Inc., Fernando Oropeza-Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Nosirrah Management, LLC v. Franklin Wireless Corp. et al
as 3:2021cv01316
Plaintiff:
Nosirrah Management, LLC
Defendant:
Franklin Wireless Corp. and O.C. Kim
Duffy v. ASNY NY, LLC, et. al
as 3:2021cv00891
Plaintiff:
Alondre Smith, Julie Hape, Mary Emter and others
Defendant:
ASNY NY, LLC, Club De Soleil Vacation Club, The ASNY Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ali v. Franklin Wireless Corp. et al
as 3:2021cv00687
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Usman Ali and Gergely Csaba
Defendant:
OC Kim, David Brown and Franklin Wireless Corp.
Petitioner:
Jack Pape and Barbara Pape
Blasic v. Franklin et al
as 3:2021cv00362
Defendant:
Mark Franklin and DOES 1 to 10
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Blasic, Sr
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441
Franklin v. Gomez et al
as 3:2021cv00252
Defendant:
Angela Bartosik, John Doe VI, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
