Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Morgan v. Rohr, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00574
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Morgan
Respondent:
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, Rohr Inc, United Technology Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr
Ewing v. Agam et al
as 3:2019cv02291
Plaintiff:
Anton Ewing
Defendant:
Kenneth Lyle Jacoby, Ori Bytton, Lior Agam and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Goodlett v. Delgado et al
as 3:2019cv01922
Defendant:
Paul Rodriguez, Charles Hamilton, Ramiro Delgado and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Goodlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hamilton v. California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv01949
Defendant:
Richard J. Donovan State Prison, R. Rodriguez, C. Legge and others
Plaintiff:
Elvin John Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02341
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Hamilton v. Spears
as 3:2018cv02429
Defendant:
Alan E. Spears
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ewing et al v. Oasis Media, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01455
Defendant:
Tyler Smyzuk, Dennis T. Brinn, Oasis Media, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anton Ewing and Collette Stark
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Bartel et al v. Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dustin Bartel , Pamela Ahlberg , Christopher Alba and others
Defendant:
Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc. and General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luckett et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ronny Luckett, Don Morgan, Dennis Hamilton and others
Defendant:
I Martin and Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summa Consulting LLC v. Crystal Vision Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02778
Plaintiff:
Summa Consulting LLC
Defendant:
Crystal Vision Enterprises, LLC , John Hamilton, Diana Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
