Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Riley v. Biotelemetry, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01972
Plaintiff:
Darby Riley
Defendant:
Biotelemetry, Inc. , CardioNet, LLC., A Biotelemetry, Inc. Company and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation v. Riley Recycling, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00954
Plaintiff:
Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation
Defendant:
Riley Recycling, Inc., Paul H. Sweeney, Sr. and Susan E. Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Hamasaed v. Nelson & Kennard et al
as 3:2014cv02011
Plaintiff:
Baktiar Hamasaed
Defendant:
Nelson & Kennard, Amanda Riley and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Riley et al v. Ally Financial Inc.
as 3:2014cv01035
Plaintiff:
Joseph Riley and Danielle Riley
Defendant:
Ally Financial Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Riley v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02556
Plaintiff:
Guy Riley
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Merck Sharp & Dohme LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Riley v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv02186
Plaintiff:
George Riley
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Riley
as 3:2011cv02042
Petitioner:
UBS Financial Services Inc. and Piper Jaffray & Co.
Respondent:
Mark C. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01808
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America, San Diego, County of, David J. Danielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
