Cases 31 - 40 of 3,048
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Amersi v. Sheridan et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Amin Amersi
Defendant:
John F Sheridan, Leigh A Vosseller, Brian B Hansen and others
Canady v. Figuera et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Canady
Defendant:
Ivan Figuera, Paola Castro, Shelly Amador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyle v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
John Lyle
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Angelica Varela and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Williams v. Paramo et al
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Marcus Pollard, M. Hagemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bushansky v. Sheridan et al
as 3:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky and Amin Amersi
Defendant:
John F Sheridan, Rebecca B Robertson, Dick P Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Ewing v. Murphy et al
as 3:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
John Anthony Murphy and Polaris Rental Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
