Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 61 - 70 of 154
Hardin v. Morris
as 3:2016cv01681
Plaintiff: Timothy Joseph Hardin
Defendant: Melanie Anne Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism et al
as 3:2016cv01614
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Morris Cerullo World Evangelism, CBS Enterprises, LLC , Allen Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Hardin v. Stetz-Hardin-Maiden et al
as 3:2016cv01680
Plaintiff: Timothy Joseph Hardin
Defendant: Jena-Lyn Rose Stetz-Hardin-Maiden, Melanie Anne Morris, Derrick Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Seizure of Jade Artifact
as 3:2016cv01371
Movant: Morris Cerullo World Evangelism
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01139
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morris v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.,
as 3:2016cv01026
Plaintiff: Florence Morris
Defendant: Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Heersink et al v. Monterey Financial Services, LLC
as 3:2016cv00626
Plaintiff: Karen Heersink , David De La Vega , Julie De La Vega and others
Defendant: Monterey Financial Services, LLC , Monterey Financial Holdings, LLC , Kuhio Banyan Owners Association and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Taylor v. Din et al
as 3:2016cv00499
Plaintiff: Michael Douglas Taylor
Defendant: Raymond A. Din, AW, Donna S. Brubaker, SSA, R. Gysler, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Davey
as 3:2016cv00196
Petitioner: Tamoyia Dushawn Morris
Respondent: D. Davey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02905
Plaintiff: Richard Thomas Morris
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?