Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lloyd v. Johnson & Johnson Corp. et al
as 3:2020cv01508
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. individually doing business as Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, a Division of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Corp., Does 1 to 100 Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Ailen Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00989
Plaintiff:
Donna Parks and Delbert Parks
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Caddy v. Coloplast Corp.
as 3:2019cv01825
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Caddy
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Perez-Rosas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00678
Plaintiff:
Adriana Perez-Rosas and Francisco Rosas
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Martinez v. Campbell et al
as 3:2017cv02143
Plaintiff:
Vicente Munoz Martinez
Defendant:
Gregory S. Campbell, M.D. , Jay Grove, M.D., Palomar Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corvera Hernandez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00914
Plaintiff:
Julia Esther Corvera Hernandez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weaver et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Weaver and James Weaver
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Lindsay et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv01639
Plaintiff:
Dianna Lindsay and Robert Lindsay
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
McIrvin et al v. Gynecare, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00844
Petitioner:
Diane McIrvin
Defendant:
Gynecare, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
