Cases 81 - 90 of 314
GREEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv02093
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LINDA HAMILTON, STEVEN KIRSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01784
Plaintiff:
GERALD LYNN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DOUGHTY, F. OLMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. DYNAN et al
as 1:2015cv01682
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
C. DYNAN, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C. E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS
as 1:2015cv01534
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
C. E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv01513
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, ONE UNKNOWN POLICY MAKER and ONE UNKNOWN SENATE MEMBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2015cv01369
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BURNO
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv01360
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., J. HOLLINGSWORTH, REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. HALL et al
as 1:2015cv01355
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
E. HALL, MARCHANELLO, BITENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv01197
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., J. HOLLINGSWORTH, BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
LEONARD C. ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
