Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Powers
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Jeffrey McClellan and W. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill et al v. Ms. Valdez et al
as 8:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill, Clifford E. Gaynor, Russell E. Lee and others
Defendant:
Ms. Valdez, Warden Roger Hester, Ms. H. Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. J Pay, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv02839
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill
Defendant:
J Pay LLC, Zephyrhills Correctional Institution and Roger Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Tyree et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
C. A. Tyree, Gwava, T. McDarby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sapp et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Lt. Sapp, Sgt. or Off. Pittman, Sgt. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Rogers et al
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
W. Rogers, A. McGregor and C. Neel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
