Cases 21 - 30 of 601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Concepcion v. E-Telequote Insurance, Inc.
as 8:2023cv02016
Plaintiff:
Henry S. Concepcion
Defendant:
E-Telequote Insurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Jacobs v. Experian Information Solutions Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Jacobs, Jr
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions Inc. and LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Benton et al v. Reliant Realty et al
as 3:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Benton and Jasmine Carswell
Defendant:
Reliant Realty and Renewel Construction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benton v. Fahlgren
as 3:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Benton
Defendant:
Steven M. Fahlgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Benton and Family v. Fahlgren
as 3:2023cv00919
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Benton and Family
Defendant:
Steven M. Fahlgren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Tudor Cay Condominium Association, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
Terese E. Jones
Defendant:
Tudor Cay Condominium Association, INC., Glausier Knight Jones, PLLC, Associa Gulf Coast, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
