Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Therrien v. Dean et al
as 5:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Therrien
Defendant:
Ed Dean, Eduardo Bustamante-Munt, Sherwin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Osborne v. Potter et al
as 6:2016cv00496
Plaintiff:
Walter Osborne
Defendant:
James Potter, Kimberly Fischer, Nicole Guillet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Zorn et al v. McNeil et al
as 6:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Katrine Zorn , Erin Daley , Walter Pooley and others
Defendant:
William McNeil and City of Casselberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paylan v. Habana Hospital Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv02720
Plaintiff:
Christina Paylan
Defendant:
Habana Hospital Pharmacy, Inc. , Stephanie Brooks , Ronda Dykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rosario v. The Media in Puerto Rico Program for Predators, Led by Ms. Barbara Walters
as 6:2015cv01656
Plaintiff:
Milca O. Rosario
Defendant:
The Media in Puerto Rico Program for Predators, Led by Ms. Barbara Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond v. Bondi et al
as 3:2015cv01156
Plaintiff:
Walter Hammond
Defendant:
Pam Bondi , The Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of Florida and Albert J. Russell Lodge No. 126 Free and Accepted Masons of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCourtney-Bates v. Bates et al
as 2:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
Barbara McCourtney-Bates
Defendant:
Walter F. Bates and William G. Prummell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
