Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robertson v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 6:2021cv01553
Plaintiff:
Pierce Robertson
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, State of Florida, One Hope United and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Baxter et al v. Santiago-Miranda et al
as 6:2021cv00718
Plaintiff:
Al-Quan Pierce and Veronica Baxter
Defendant:
Sheriff Wayne Ivey, Jefet Santiago-Miranda, Carson Hendren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watts v. Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois et al
as 8:2019cv00829
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Michael F. Otto, Daniel J. Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Wayne Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prosperous v. Todd et al
as 8:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Prosperous
Defendant:
Kimberly Todd, Sherwood Coleman, James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prosperous v. Todd et al
as 8:2017cv00996
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Love Prosperous
Defendant:
Kimberly Todd , Jack Hellinger , James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
