Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Caldwell v. Roberts et al
as 8:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant:
John Roberts, William H. Pryor, Jr., Mary S. Scriven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Bongiovanni et al v. Austin et al
as 3:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Brittany Bongiovanni, Jessica Caldwell, Erin Davis and others
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Karl Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crosby et al v. Austin et al
as 8:2021cv02730
Plaintiff:
Howard Crosby, Gary Bodony, Eric Burgess and others
Defendant:
III Lloyd Austin, Frank Kendall, Karl Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Caldwell v. CG Real Estate Investment, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv02321
Plaintiff:
Joyce Caldwell
Defendant:
Lauderdale-Dell Lake Village, LLC and CG Real Estate Investment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Caldwell v. City of Melbourne et al
as 6:2019cv00765
Defendant:
City of Melbourne and Ralph Keller
Plaintiff:
Scott Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Derryberry et al
as 8:2016cv03482
Plaintiff:
Derrel Leonard Thomas
Defendant:
Shane Derryberry, Josh Caldwell, Jeff McDougal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caldwell v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Emmett Caldwell
Defendant:
Allen Shaffer, John Doe and City of Fort Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allmond v. Mack et al
as 3:2015cv00624
Plaintiff:
Darryl Allmond
Defendant:
S. M. Mack, Dale Carson Law, Samantha Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
