Cases 111 - 120 of 175
Haynes v. Clark et al
as 3:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
L. T. Clark, U.C.I. Security and U.C.I. Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Clark et al
as 6:2013cv01223
Defendant:
Kerry Danyeal Clark and State of Florida, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montes v. Landt et al
as 5:2013cv00323
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Sanchez Montes
Defendant:
Robert E. Landt, Sandra Edward-Stephens, Brad King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv01029
Petitioner:
Damion E. Clark
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00597
Petitioner:
Damion E. Clark
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Tucker et al
as 2:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clark
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker, Warden Chapam, FNU Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Tucker et al
as 8:2013cv02006
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clark
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker, Warden Chapam, FNU Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. USA
as 8:2013cv00826
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Clarke
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brown v. Cameron et al
as 3:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Brown
Defendant:
Tony Cameron, John Mills, Glen Jernigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2013cv00044
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Clark
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
