Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Fuce v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Fuce, Sr.
Defendant:
Lenny Curry, Sheriff Mike Willams, Armor Correctional Health Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliphant v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Respondent:
Lenny Curry, Mike Williams and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oliphant v. Lenny Curry et al.
as 3:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Defendant:
Lenny Curry, Mike Williams, Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Spear et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Spear, Carr, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yatsenko v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Anton V. Yatsenko
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avakian v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Nerses Hratch Avakian
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliphant v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. State of Florida
as 3:2021cv01278
Plaintiff:
James Prescott Curry
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higginbotham v. Johnson et al
as 5:2021cv00587
Plaintiff:
Kevin Higginbotham
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU MacMiller and FNU Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00476
Petitioner:
Dayeisha Curry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
