Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Daughtry v. Bryant et al
as 6:2019cv01810
Defendant:
Hebner Bryant, Correctional Officer Mansfield, Correctional Officer Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Daughtry and Phillip Junior Daughtry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Doe, et al.
as 3:2019cv00751
Defendant:
Correction Officer John Doe Owen(s), Warden Polk, Sergeant Herring and others
Plaintiff:
Byron D. Waller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bluitt v. Cammarano et al
as 5:2019cv00199
Defendant:
Lietutenant Cammarano, Lieutenant Wilson, Correctional Officer Whitlow and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Bluitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bluitt v. Cammarano et al
as 6:2019cv00694
Defendant:
Lietutenant Cammarano, Lieutenant Wilson, Correctional Officer Whitlow and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Bluitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Volcy v. Spradley
as 3:2019cv00090
Plaintiff:
MarKenson Florival Volcy, MarKus V, MarKenson Volcy and others
Defendant:
Correctional Officer M. W. Spradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Lamb et al
as 3:2018cv01185
Defendant:
Wentz, Correctional Officer Young, Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champ v. Charlotte County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv00582
Defendant:
Charlotte County Sheriff, Charlotte County Sheriff's Office and Chief Correctional Officer
Plaintiff:
Sean Phillip Champ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dinunzio v. Faye et al
as 6:2018cv01110
Defendant:
Halfhide O'Neil, Spencer Faye, Correctional Officer Dowdy and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dinunzio Dominick and Dominick Joseph Dinunzio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00834
Defendant:
W. Clemmons, L.W. Harrell, S. Hancock and others
Plaintiff:
Dionte Jermaine Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Schwartz
as 5:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz, Jr.
Defendant:
E. Schwartz and Unknown Correctional Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
