Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Haynes et al v. S.C.I. Security et al
as 3:2013cv01467
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Javar C Murphy
Defendant:
S.C.I. Security, Suwannee Security Personnel and Michael B. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv00814
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Javar Murphy
Defendant:
A. Johnson, N. Jeffcoat and Secretary of D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joassin v. Lieutenant Murphy et al
as 3:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Jean Joassin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Murphy, Sergeant Rodgers, Officer Coats and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Grubbs et al
as 3:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Javar C Murphy
Defendant:
Sergeant T. Grubbs, Officer Marcus Alwright, Nurse Swan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Grubbs et al
as 3:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Javar Murphy
Defendant:
Sergeant T. Grubbs, Officer Marcus Alwright, Nurse Swan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Tucker
as 8:2012cv02434
Petitioner:
Elton Brutus Murphy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montgomery v. Federal Bureau of Prisions et al
as 5:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Vernon Montgomery
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions and J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hanley v. Tucker et al
as 8:2012cv02043
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Hanley
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker, Officer Murphy, Mr. Slone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Florida Attorney General
as 5:2012cv00124
Petitioner:
Jace R. Murphy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. USA
as 8:2011cv02767
Plaintiff:
Tricia N. Murphy
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
