Cases 51 - 60 of 200
Thomas v. Orange County Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Eddie D. Thomas
Defendant:
Orange County Corrections, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baalim v. USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert KO Cody, II
Defendant:
USA, Inc., State of Florida, Orlando Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Orange County Corrections Dept.
as 6:2022cv00501
Petitioner:
Gregory R. Lane
Respondent:
Orange County Corrections Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adolphe v. Quinones et al
as 6:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jean Rony Adolphe
Defendant:
Louis A. Quinones, Jr., Jospeh Cameron, Dan Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melear v. Orange County Board of Commissioners et al
as 6:2021cv02077
Plaintiff:
Wayne Melear
Defendant:
Orange County Board of Commissioners, John Mina and Robert Wesley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Lane et al
as 6:2021cv01934
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Defendant:
Rayfield Lane, Mitchell R. Lane, Melody Y. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melear v. Orange County Jail
as 6:2021cv01923
Plaintiff:
Wayne Melear
Defendant:
Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Vil v. Tyler et al
as 6:2021cv01753
Plaintiff:
Wingly St. Vil, Wingly Saint Vil and Wingly StVil
Defendant:
Howard Tyler and Orange County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01714
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mackroy v. Warden, Orange County Jail
as 6:2021cv00806
Petitioner:
Latavis D. Mackroy
Respondent:
Warden, Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
