Cases 61 - 70 of 101
Bright v. Graham et al
as 8:2014cv01775
Plaintiff:
Leon Bright
Defendant:
Officer Graham, John Doe, City of Tampa, FL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. State Of Florida
as 6:2014cv01169
Petitioner:
Elderidge Jamarr Graham
Respondent:
State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Graham v. Warden of DeSoto C.I.
as 2:2014cv00264
Petitioner:
Equis T. Graham
Respondent:
Warden of DeSoto C.I. and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. Graham
as 3:2014cv00345
Plaintiff:
Alex Diaz
Defendant:
Andrew Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv00406
Petitioner:
William T. Graham
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00297
Petitioner:
William T. Graham
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haynes v. U.C.I. Security Personnel et al
as 3:2013cv01517
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Dereke J Graham
Defendant:
U.C.I. Security Personnel, U.C.I. Mental Health Services, Officer McGinley, Daniel C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springs v. Graham et al
as 3:2013cv01100
Plaintiff:
Demetrius L. Springs
Defendant:
John Doe Graham, Donnetta Robinson, John Doe Lesley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. SERGEANT HEART et al
as 3:2013cv00881
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Dereke Graham
Defendant:
SERGEANT HEART, U.C.I. Security and U.C.I. Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes et al v. McGintey et al
as 3:2013cv00882
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Dereke Graham
Defendant:
Officer Daniel C. McGintey, Sergeant L. Cary, U.C.I. Mental Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
