Cases 61 - 70 of 120
BAKER v. DOE et al
as 3:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
Noel George Baker
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
T. Jarvis, L. Shultz, FNU Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owens v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Toni Bowden, Ebony Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Connor v. Carrasquillo et al
as 3:2015cv01513
Plaintiff:
Nyka O'Connor
Defendant:
Hector Carrasquillo, Joshua Bostic, Kraun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Doe et al
as 6:2015cv02122
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Youngblood
Defendant:
John Doe, 1 and John Doe, 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Knight et al
as 3:2015cv01245
Plaintiff:
Sha'Ron L. Mobley
Defendant:
Knight, Samuel E Mason, Warden R.M.C. Lake Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Michael D. Crews et al
as 3:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tony Romano
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Michael D. Crews, South Florida Reception Center (S.F.R.C.) Warden John Doe (1), Intake Officer John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabris v. Lyons et al
as 8:2015cv01223
Plaintiff:
Mario Lee Fabris
Defendant:
Michael L. Lyon, Charles Feldman, Gary G. Felice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mccray v. Townsend et al
as 3:2015cv00628
Plaintiff:
Terrance Mccray
Defendant:
Sgt. Townsend , SGT. Aretino , SGT. Boyyett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Youngblood v. Doe #1 et al
as 6:2015cv00712
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Youngblood
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
