Cases 1 - 10 of 288
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vega v. Paramore et al
as 5:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Waiter H. Paramore, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCoy v. Flowers et al
as 6:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Idecheac A. McCoy
Defendant:
Mark Flowers, Deputy Nelson, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klask v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Brenda Klask
Defendant:
CO K. Miller, Sheriff Carmine Marceno, Lieutenant V. Amoroso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Graceville Correctional Facility
as 8:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Willis Armando Miller
Defendant:
Graceville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 8:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Wells
as 8:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Timothy Howell
Defendant:
Rick Wells, Yvonne Miller, Tom Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Le Clerc v. Guy et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
John I. Guy and Mark R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
James Hoover
Defendant:
Lieutenant Miller and Captain Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
