Cases 1 - 9 of 9
O'Conner v. Snider et al
as 2:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Nyka O'Conner
Defendant:
Derek Snider, Inspector Ryder, Sgt Gerack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustine v. Guevara et al
as 6:2022cv01965
Plaintiff:
Andre Augustine
Defendant:
Eliezer Nazario Guevara, Anthony Ryder, Jarrett Lorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antoine v. Danuals et al
as 2:2021cv00360
Defendant:
FNU Ryder, Gabriel Kyerematen and FNU Danuals
Plaintiff:
Junior Antoine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon et al v. Flagler County Detention Facility
as 3:2021cv00149
Defendant:
Flagler County Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Alfred L. Shavers, Joseph Christopher Colon, Christopher Shane Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon et al v. Flagler County Detention Facility
as 6:2021cv00284
Defendant:
Flagler County Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Alfred L. Shavers, Joseph Christopher Colon, Christopher Shane Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryder v. United States of America
as 8:2017cv01064
Plaintiff:
Christopher Owen Ryder
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ryder v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2010cv02254
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Martin Ryder
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ryder v. Secretary Department of Corrections
as 8:2009cv02019
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Martin Ryder
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryder v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv00041
Petitioner:
William F. Ryder
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
