Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Arora v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ashok Arora
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., John Does 1 through 50 and others
Trustee:
Aaron R. Cohen, court-appointed Chapter 7 Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maycom, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maycom, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. doing business as T-Mobile and Sprint Solutions, Inc. doing business as T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kotz v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kotz and Eugene Kotz, II
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01466
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hope v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Omijah Hope
Defendant:
Sprint United Management Company, T-Mobile USA, Inc. formerly known as Sprint Corporation doing business as Sprint and Sprint Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
De Leon, Jr. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00943
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pablo De Leon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nicks-McCaleb v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2020cv00684
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander D. Nicks-McCaleb
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Meacham v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2019cv00963
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Meacham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
