Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Ingram v. Antionelli et al
as 5:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Terry Ingram
Defendant:
FNU Antionelli, FNU Phelps, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps et al v. Bennett et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps and Jamal Lee Bell
Defendant:
W.T. Bennett, C.A. Tyre, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sapp et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Lt. Sapp, Sgt. or Off. Pittman, Sgt. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Professional Service Industries, Inc. v. Hensel Phelps Construction Company
as 8:2022cv00782
Petitioner:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Professional Service Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Hensel Phelps Construction Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
George v. Berman et al
as 5:2021cv00632
Plaintiff:
Romancee Oshay George
Defendant:
M. Berman, James Pappas, Kristie Mathieu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv02105
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Taylor Phelps
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phelps v. Vector Marketing Corp.
as 2:2021cv00860
Plaintiff:
Michael Phelps
Defendant:
Vector Marketing Corp.
Phelps v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv01061
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Don Davis, Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv01004
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Mark Inch, John Doe, J. Birdsong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
