Cases 31 - 40 of 289
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Courtney Lamar Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Woods et al
as 3:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamar Thomas
Defendant:
B.W. Woods, Sean Fogarty, Carabetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. McClauey
as 6:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Edwards
Defendant:
Fnu McClauey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. McClauey
as 2:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Edwards
Defendant:
Fnu McClauey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00001
Petitioner:
Daphedron Lamar Allen
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Carabth et al
as 3:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamar Thomas
Defendant:
Carabth and T. Reagor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Nesbit
as 2:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lamar Gibson
Defendant:
Nesbit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Silva et al
as 6:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Edwards
Defendant:
Ms. Silva and Warden S. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Officer McClauley et al
as 6:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Edwards
Defendant:
Officer McClauley, Larry Flonnery, Captain Labelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
