Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Cotter v. Southern Transcription Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ellen Cotter
Defendant:
Southern Transcription Services, Inc. and Hannah Brooks Morris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carter v. Koskinen et al
as 8:2016cv02969
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thomas Carter
Defendant:
John Koskinen, Carolyn W. Colvin, Sheryl Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hannah v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv01743
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Hannah
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00887
Plaintiff:
Hannah Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Razes et al v. Tudor Insurance Company
as 8:2015cv01323
Plaintiff:
Anna Razes and Elbert Hannah
Defendant:
Tudor Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hannah v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Norris, Griffis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Union Correctional Institution
as 8:2014cv01238
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Union Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Optimum Freedom Ins. Co. et al
as 8:2014cv01046
Plaintiff:
Nate Hannah
Defendant:
Optimum Freedom Ins. Co. and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Norris et al
as 3:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis, Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
