Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Cases 41 - 50 of 124
Torres v. Mapp et al
as 6:2018cv00197
Plaintiff: Eugenio Santiago Torres
Defendant: Randolph Mapp and Salson Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henderson et al v. US Roof Recycle, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01428
Plaintiff: Joshua Henderson , Rodney Randolph and Nathaniel Porter
Defendant: US Roof Recycle, LLC and Johann Bowman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rawiszer v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 6:2017cv01858
Plaintiff: Randolph Rawiszer
Defendant: The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez-Davis v. Randolph We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv01641
Plaintiff: Mildred Perez-Davis
Defendant: Scott Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smiroldo v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01035
Plaintiff: Randolph Smiroldo
Defendant: Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Randolph v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2017cv00212
Petitioner: Jaques D. Randolph
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Randolph v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00816
Plaintiff: Brian Randolph
Defendant: Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00794
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00116
Plaintiff: Aurelia Randolph Hamilton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mims v. Randolph Hotel, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00352
Plaintiff: Krystal Mims
Defendant: Randolph Hotel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?