Cases 61 - 70 of 147
Gladney v. Internal Revenue Service
as 8:2016cv01700
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Daniel Gladney
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Smith v. Internal Revenue Service
as 8:2016mc00075
Plaintiff:
Gavin Smith
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Garretson v. United States of America et al
as 6:2016cv00719
Plaintiff:
Mary N. Garretson
Defendant:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lazenberry v. Internal Revenue Services, Claims Dept.
as 3:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lazenberry
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Services, Claims Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. 40.653 Acres Of Land in Osceola County Florida et al
as 6:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
40.653 Acres Of Land in Osceola County Florida, Brown Ranch Six, LLC, Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Teasers Cocoa, Inc. v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 6:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Teasers Cocoa, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, Kandi Wilson, Adrianna Arreaga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Kelly v. Cathey et al
as 5:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Neil Kelly
Defendant:
Diana C. Cathey, Ivory Jones, Estate of Thomas A. Jones, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
McDonald Stewart v. Internal Revenue Service
as 8:2015cv01487
Plaintiff:
Jeanette McDonald Stewart
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00069
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anthony v. SECO et al
as 5:2015mc00001
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony
Defendant:
SECO, Marion County Utilities, Marion Oaks Civic Association and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
