Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Geri v. Reagor et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joseph Geri
Defendant:
Reagor and Cantu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantu v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2023cv00400
Petitioner:
Antonio Cantu, Sr
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cantu v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00259
Petitioner:
Antonio Cantu, Sr and Antonio Cantu
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cantu v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv00637
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Fred Cantu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cantu v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00832
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Cantu
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cantu v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv00852
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Fred Cantu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ironworkers Local 808 et al v. Proweld, LLC
as 6:2018cv00810
Plaintiff:
Ironworkers Local 808 , Ironworkers Local Union 808 Pension Fund , Ironworkers Local Union 808 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Proweld, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ironworkers Local 808 et al v. Concrete Erectors, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00809
Plaintiff:
Ironworkers Local 808 , Ironworkers Local Union 808 Pension Fund , Ironworkers Local Union 808 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Concrete Erectors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cantu v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Marie Cantu
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martinez-Cantu v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv01206
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez-Cantu
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
