Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 8:2021cv02080
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dragash
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Defendant., Gray Robinson, P.A., United States Attorney Office for the Middle District of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Falcon Medical Group, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 6:2019cv01417
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Plaintiff:
Falcon Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Steinrock
as 8:2019cv01693
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Defendant:
Alexander Steinrock and Alexander M. Steinrock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02218
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Dyer v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 5:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Neil Dyer
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newkirk v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA.
as 8:2017cv00630
Plaintiff:
Raymond Newkirk
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Blake et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 6:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jasmin Blake and Burnett Blake
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Waisome et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 6:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
Sherone Waisome and Verna Waisome
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, All Persons or Entities Unknown and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
