Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Gabriel et al v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Kathleen T Gabriel and Terrance C Gabriel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Murrell v. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation
as 8:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Murrell
Defendant:
Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Broton
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jennifer A. Broton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bowen v. Prock et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Nathaniel Bowen
Defendant:
Prock, Pittman, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 8:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jennifer A. Broton and Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
