Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Garner v. J & C Energy Enterprises LLC
as 8:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Benjamin John Garner
Defendant:
J & C Energy Enterprises LLC., d/b/a ESD Solar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Robinson v. Henry et al
as 6:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Ramone Dayne Robinson
Defendant:
Duane Henry, Kadean Wilson, Trevor Persenaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pair et al v. Postal Fleet Services Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pair and William Garner
Defendant:
Postal Fleet Services, Inc., The Stageline Company, Vilano Employment Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Acousti Engineering Company of Florida v. Velasco et al
as 6:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Acousti Engineering Company of Florida
Defendant:
Carlos Velasco, Marbel Bautista, Joel Palmer and others
Garner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Garner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Garner et al
as 3:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Johnson
Defendant:
Garner and Tomlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Aztec Plumbing, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Brandon Garner
Defendant:
Aztec Plumbing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Garner v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2021cv00609
Petitioner:
Nicholis Corey Garner
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GARNER v. Enhanced Recovery Company LLC
as 3:2019cv00863
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company LLC
Plaintiff:
ALONZO GARNER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
