Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lumpkins v. Annett Holdings, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
David Lumpkins
Defendant:
Annett Holdings, Inc. doing business as TMC Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. One More Round, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Songs of Universal, Inc. , Get Loose Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
One More Round, Inc., Stephen A. Benaski and Heather R. Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jablonski v. Mazer et al
as 2:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Jablonski
Defendant:
Jason S. Mazer , Meghan C. Moore , R. Hugh Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Copeland v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00568
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Julie Jones , Secretary, Department of Corrections , FNU Jordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumpkin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00864
Petitioner:
Robert Lumpkin
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lumpkin v. Volusia Traders, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv02049
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lumpkin
Defendant:
Volusia Traders, Inc. and Alex Spanos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lumpkin v. Fast Payday Loans, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ashley Lumpkin
Defendant:
Fast Payday Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Albers v. Williams et al
as 6:2011cv01460
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Albers
Defendant:
P. Williams and Darlene Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
