Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hicks v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 8:2013cv01524
Plaintiff:
Janice Hicks and William M. Hicks
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hicks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2012cv01028
Plaintiff:
Stacy M. Hicks
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HOLMES v. WARDEN
as 3:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
MARCUS X HOLMES
Defendant:
RUGS, M Hicks, G L MAXWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Brown et al
as 3:2009cv00817
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sapp
Defendant:
C. Brown, S. T. Robinson, S. Milliken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spiker v. Hicks et al
as 3:2009cv00479
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Spiker
Defendant:
M. Hicks, W. Tate and J. Bostic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spiker v. Hicks et al
as 3:2009cv00426
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Spiker
Defendant:
M. Hicks, W. Tate and J. Bostic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELM et al v. CRIST et al
as 3:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
McArthur Helm, MICHAEL HUTCHISON, William Edwards and others
Defendant:
Charlie Crist, Walter McNeil, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Official Warden et al
as 3:2008cv01151
Plaintiff:
Marcus X. Holmes
Defendant:
Official Warden, Sgt. Rugs, M. Hicke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. McNeil et al
as 3:2008cv01035
Plaintiff:
David Lee Moore
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, M. Hicks, R. Newel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alvarez v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00834
Plaintiff:
Manuel Everett Alvarez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, James McNeal, Union Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
