Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Wiggins v. Oneal
as 6:2024cv01212
Defendant:
Probation Officer Melavan Oneal
Plaintiff:
Frederick C. Wiggins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Riggs et al
as 8:2024cv01407
Defendant:
E. Riggs, John Doe #3, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Riggs et al
as 2:2024cv00570
Defendant:
Officer Oneal, Officer John Doe #3, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Oneal et al
as 6:2024cv01039
Defendant:
Melavan Oneal and Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Frederick C. Wiggins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridgeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Michael Oneal Bridgeman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Norfleet v. Charlotte County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
Charlotte County Sheriffs Office and Officer ONeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oneal v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 6:2024cv00600
Petitioner:
Mckenzie D. Oneal
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kroft v. ONeal
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Kroft
Defendant:
ONeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corley v. Tractor Supply Company et al
as 8:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Ricky Oneal Corley
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company, FSC TSC Brooksville FL LLC and Four Springs Capital Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Oneal v. Protective Enterprises Public Safety, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Quantisha Oneal
Defendant:
Protective Enterprises Public Safety, LLC and Marcus D. Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
