Cases 1 - 10 of 62
JONES v. KING et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES and JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
JOSHEPH J BIDEN, WAKULLA ANNEX CORRECTION INSTITUTION SHIFT SUPERVISOR, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SOUTH FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
SOUTH FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER, L JACKSON, T SMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
DARREN TARRELL KING
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KING v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv24766
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VINCENT KING
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, CHIP SIMONS and J BRAVO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv24762
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VINCENT KING
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS, HARRIS and CARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. INGRAM et al
as 5:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
BERNARD D WILSON
Defendant:
INGRAM, GRANGER, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. ORTEGA et al
as 3:2023cv08554
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L BLAKE
Defendant:
ORTEGA, J COON, ROESKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARCELONA v. SALMAN et al
as 4:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
JOEL BARCELONA
Defendant:
SALMAN, LEE, RAMON BASSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCIS v. MAYO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FRANCIS
Defendant:
MAYO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, OFFICER J KING, SGT E WILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOSEPH
as 3:2021cv00978
Petitioner:
ISAAC SEAN KING
Respondent:
M V JOSEPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
