Cases 1 - 10 of 89
RIVERS v. OMALLEY
as 4:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
JAMES RIVERS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHAPMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA LYNN CHAPMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ENGSTROM v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Engstrom
Defendant:
Secretary Social Security and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
EDWARDS v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
HERSHEL EDWARDS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JACKSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2023cv14428
Plaintiff:
EUGENE W. JACKSON and EUGENE W JACKSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ZORN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
ROGER JAMES ZORN, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHEPHERD v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
VINCENT SCOTT SHEPHERD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
POSEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 3:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUSSELL POSEY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
JONES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
IAN E. JONES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SANMIGUEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
EDGARDO SANMIGUEL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
