Cases 11 - 20 of 207
BETANCOURT v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
IVY BETANCOURT
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BARRY REDDISH and CYNTHIA UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THAMES v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
TAMMY THAMES
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BILAL v. BENOIT et al
as 3:2023cv04754
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL ALI BILAL, JOHN L. BURTON and SUPERMAN
Defendant:
JEFFREY BENOIT, JOHN HODGES, TED SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
DENISE FRAZIER
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC doing business as CENTURION PROFESSIONALS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VINSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
JANCIE A VINSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00610
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
