Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 31 - 40 of 47
ADAMS v. POOL et al
as 3:2014cv00407
Plaintiff: ANGELA S ADAMS
Defendant: HAROLD POOL and DAVID MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WAMBLES v. MCALPIN et al
as 5:2014cv00040
Plaintiff: JAMIE WAMBLES
Defendant: BURT MCALPIN and ADAM BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00235
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WALKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2013cv00146
Plaintiff: BRANDON WALKER
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA, ADAM UNA, GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CADD v. DARNELL et al
as 1:2013cv00119
Defendant: SADIE DARNELL, ADAM RAREY and DAVID BROWN
Plaintiff: ALFREEDA CADD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00211
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WALKER v. GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00059
Plaintiff: BRANDON WALKER
Defendant: GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPT, MIKE SCHENTRUP, ADAM URRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA et al
as 3:2012cv00580
Plaintiff: BILL ADAMS
Defendant: CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA , CHIP SIMMONS and R EAGERTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PETE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00353
Plaintiff: RODNEY PETE
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINE ENGLAND, ADRO JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?