Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv22340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WAGGONER v. DEFUNIAK SPRINGS CITY et al
as 3:2022cv07858
Plaintiff:
PAUL DOUGLAS WAGGONER
Defendant:
DEFUNIAK SPRINGS CITY, JAMES HURLEY, MICHAEL A ADKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
SHARP v. CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS et al
as 1:2020cv00047
Defendant:
Kendrick Hampton, HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Adam Joy and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lydell Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HOLLEY v. CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS et al
as 1:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOLLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS and EDWIN BOOTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
PRITCHARD v. CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS FLORIDA et al
as 1:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
BRIAN J PRITCHARD
Defendant:
CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS FLORIDA and JAMES TROIANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRENSHAW et al v. CITY OF DEFUNIAK SPRINGS et al
as 3:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CRENSHAW and HELEN L CRENSHAW
Defendant:
CITY OF DEFUNIAK SPRINGS, MAC WORK, KERMIT WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
