Cases 161 - 170 of 14,136
JAYLEE v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER JAYLEE
Defendant:
JEFFREY R SUTTON and WENDY Y SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHISOLM v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
DEONDRE MIJAHN CHISOLM
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and N PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENGLISH v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
CORDARREL ENGLISH
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATSON v. HARRIS
as 4:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
TODD E WATSON
Respondent:
SHEVAUN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
DAVHON YOUNG and DA'VHON YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. WARDEN FRANKLIN CI
as 4:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
TERRY SANDERS
Respondent:
WARDEN FRANKLIN CI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOYON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
RYAN R DOYON and RYAN ROBERT DOYON
Defendant:
MR RICKY DIXON, MR KEEN, TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASEY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CASEY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. MERCER, et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
WADE MERCER, SALES PERSON EMPLOYEE, WILLIAMS R WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
