Cases 171 - 180 of 14,142
COLVILLE v. CHESTNUT et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
JACOB MONROE COLVILLE
Defendant:
T CHESTNUT and ESCAMBIA COUNTY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BILLEAUD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BILLEAUD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISOTPHER HELMS, J HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. DYKES et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAMES DIXON, JR
Defendant:
TRAVIS EARL DYKES, JONATHAN L CARTER, TYLER MARIE MCCRANIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACFADDIN v. BLACKWATER RIVER CORRECTIONAL REHABILITATION FACILITY CENTER
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH COLEMAN MACFADDIN
Defendant:
BLACKWATER RIVER CORRECTIONAL REHABILITATION FACILITY CENTER, CENTURION MEDICAL CENTER and SEAN G PAVOLKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHAEL v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
LINDA MICHAEL
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, THOMAS BAKKEDAHL and CYNTHIA COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYNN v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
HENRY LYNN
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JAYLEE v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER JAYLEE
Defendant:
JEFFREY R SUTTON and WENDY Y SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JOHNSON v. GARRETT
as 3:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
WALTER JOHNSON, III
Respondent:
C GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
