Cases 1 - 10 of 301
BROWN v. FOSKEY et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
ELIAS FOSKEY and JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAMBLES v. BROWN
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
JAMIE WAMBLES
Defendant:
J BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. ARCH
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
CAREN L ARCH
Respondent:
BROWN, RICKY DIXON and SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANKS v. LONG et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
JESSE BANKS and JESSE BANKS, III
Defendant:
T LONG, MS. MELVIN, MICHAEL BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. BASFORD et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
SHONDARIOUS CLEO BROWN
Defendant:
L BASFORD and R BORDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TLUSTY v. SWAIN et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TLUSTY and ROBERT J TLUSTY
Defendant:
D SWAIN, K DAVIS, J ELLENBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
