Cases 1 - 10 of 58
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JONES, IV
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, MS COOK, J JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. BARTON et al
as 5:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
MARY BARTON, JAMES SKIPPER, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. COOK et al
as 3:2023cv17136
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
G COOK, JOSHUA D HATTAWAY and RANDELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOKS v. LEON COUNTY et al
as 4:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
TAREYAN COOKS, ANDIZA JOEL COOKS and CHARLES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LEON COUNTY, CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, WALTER MCNEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. COOK et al
as 3:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
G COOK, JOSHUA D HATTAWAY, RANDELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OCONNOR v. CLARK et al
as 5:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
SEAN MICHAEL OCONNOR
Defendant:
BRANTLEY CLARK, JR, DEDEE COSTELLO, JENNIFER LIEB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOKE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TODD COOKE
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, WATKINS, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
ROYLIN JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
JESSE WILLIAMS, DUVAL, BERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. FILIPI et al
as 3:2021cv04691
Plaintiff:
LARRY JAMES TAYLOR
Defendant:
FILIPI, SWANSON, ZULLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
