Cases 1 - 10 of 196
EVANS v. LEBLANC et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
PARIS DEMETRIUS EVANS
Defendant:
BOB LEBLANC, GARY E MOLEK, HEATHER DANIELLE PASTOOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DARRELL DANIELS
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, JULIE JONES, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE KEY KEY, CHRISTOPHER HELMS, J HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. DYKES et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAMES DIXON, JR
Defendant:
TRAVIS EARL DYKES, JONATHAN L CARTER, TYLER MARIE MCCRANIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISOTPHER HELMS, J HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOXSON v. LEAVINS
as 3:2023cv24670
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE DANIEL BLOXSON
Respondent:
DONALD LEAVINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DANIELS v. ARROYO et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C DANIELS
Defendant:
CHRISTINE L ARROYO, MS HEMLINGER, MRS MCCALPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANNELL v. FOLSOM et al
as 5:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
JAMES JUSTIN CHANNELL
Defendant:
ROWDY FOLSOM, LIKELY, NATASHA GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANBLOUNT v. MIDDLEBROOKS et al
as 5:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE S VAN BLOUNT and CLARENCE S VANBLOUNT
Defendant:
MIDDLEBROOKS, A POLLOCK, WOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. GABBY
as 4:2023cv00365
Petitioner:
DANIELLE DEVONA JONES
Respondent:
SEGAL and GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
